3. Why creative diversification matters for performance
Another interesting perspective came from Emil Bielski at Tube Science, who discussed the risks of relying too heavily on existing top-performing creative.
While producing variations of successful ads can help maintain performance, repeatedly using similar concepts may eventually limit opportunities to reach new audiences.
Emil suggested that 30% of creative assets should be entirely new concepts rather than iterations of existing ads. He also highlighted the challenge of consistently producing effective creative. According to the figures shared during the session, average in-house teams achieve a creative hit rate of around 5%, measured by ads meeting CPA targets, while Tube Science aims for 25%.
The discussion emphasised the importance of testing genuinely different creative approaches rather than continually refining existing assets.
One example was The Farmer’s Dog, where shifting from high-production storytelling towards more personal, relatable content helped support the brand’s acquisition strategy.
Emil also discussed the value of working with a wider range of smaller, authentic creators who align with the brand, rather than relying exclusively on high-profile partnerships.
Exploring different formats, including personal stories, skits and game shows, can also help brands identify new ways to engage audiences.
For performance marketers, this reinforces the importance of creative diversification as part of ongoing campaign testing.
Optimising successful assets remains valuable, but introducing new concepts may help uncover additional opportunities for growth.